You were involved in a
car accident on the streets of California.
There were no significant bodily injuries but you did experience
emotional distress because of the automobile accident. Now you wonder: Am I able to make an
insurance claim for emotional distress or physiological injuries that happened
and I now suffer from the accident?
Tag: personal injury attorney, car accident attorney, personal injury attorneys, personal injury lawyer
DAMAGES
COMPENSATION FOR CAR ACCIDENTS IS NORMAL
When someone gets hurt in an
automobile or trucking accident, they can offer an insurance claim for personal
injury to the insurance company for the person who was driving the other car. Money compensation in the form of damages that
a claimant will be entitled to for form a car accident or truck accident or
motorcycle collision case include medical invoices, loss of income from not
being able to work at your job, and compensation for pain and suffering. The law of California says that a component
of pain and suffering includes the emotional distress and psychological anxiety
that accompanies what happens after a car collision. On the other hand, the worst part of being in
this accident is dealing with your injuries and spending all of your free time for
possibly months going to doctors to get better.
That is the demanding part of the accident, not the few hours or less
that you actually spend on the roadside after the car accident. You might also be very stressed out if your
injuries will ever be better or if you do not make a full recovery. You might be concerned and have emotional
distress if your injuries do not resolve after some medical treatment.
Tag: personal injury attorney, car accident attorney, personal injury attorneys, personal injury lawyer
PERSONALINURURY LAWYERS ARE VERY GOOD AT OBTAINING COMPENSATION FOR BODILY INJURY
Without any bodily injuries, your
only pain, distress and suffering will come from simply being involved in the
accident only. The accident itself is
really more accurately described as inconvenient, with no bodily injuries; you
don’t really have pain from the accident although it will cause you undue
stress. So the common man wouldn’t think
that a no injury car accident would be very stressful. And “the common man” is
who you might expect to be part of a jury that decides your case. The common man might have trouble thinking
you should gbe awarded money for this “inconvenience” because it is not really
true pain and suffering in the traditional sense.
Nonetheless, there are individuals
that might have a lot of emotional distress from something that most people could
shrug off as a minor situation. But demonstrating this distress to a jury
could be hard to do. It is easy to show
to a jury physical injuries like a fractured arm. You can show radiology films
to prove that. Emotional distress is not
that easy to prove to a jury. People can
have a difficult time believe that someone suffered emotional distress in an
accident with little bodily pains. It is going to take a team of expert
witnesses like a doctor of psychiatry, called as a witness by your personal injury attorney. Only with this kind of
help can you have someone testify that you suffered emotionally with no bodily
injury.
0 comments:
Post a Comment